Manitoba Social Innovation Stories Project

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything

Workforce Leaders Chart Course for Non-profits’ Future

by Zack Gross

A year of meetings, networking, events and engagement with government have led to the Manitoba non-profit sector taking stock of its past and present, and embarking on its future.   The Manitoba Federation of Non-Profit Organizations (MFNPO) has made a solid connection with our provincial government, enlisting the participation of its Statistics Bureau in quantifying and analyzing the situation of the sector in Manitoba’s changing demographic.

 

            Wilf Falk, Chief Provincial Statistician, says that the non-profit sector needs to know what the trends are in the province and how they will impact on our population and on our organizations.  For instance, we have 16,000 new immigrants arriving every year, the greatest number since the end of World War II.  We need to understand how this will change our province and change the role of non-profits – what the needs will be and what the workforce will need to be capable of.

            As our aboriginal population grows, greater efforts are being made to get the advice of First Nations leaders in order to meet their needs both as a community as a workers in the non-profit sector.  Similarly with new Manitobans from overseas, we need to see how to connect with new-to-us cultures.  No longer is it acceptably to say that so-called “minority groups” must adapt to our way of doing things. Florence Okwudili, a Manitoban of Nigerian origin and MFNPO Board Member, says that we need to understand the change that is happening in our province, and that leaders in our workforce and government need to pay attention to that change and to society’s needs.

            Says Wilf Falk:  If we are going to get off the merry-go-round, we need to engage in planning based on knowing the facts of our province’s current development.  This includes dealing with the changes that will take place when the Baby Boom Generation retires.  He asks:  How will the sector adapt to the loss of knowledge and replace the people, skills and networks that now exist?  How will we ensure that competent, energetic people want to work in the non-profit sector?

             Adds Monika Feist, CEO and Director of the Success Skills Centre, we need to share our stories, challenges and hopes.  It doesn’t matter whether we are from Winnipeg, a rural area or the North, we are likely dealing with many of the same issues.  Bev Stuart, Director of the Alliance of Manitoba Sector Councils, says that the non-profit sector is one of the largest entities in the industrial workforce, standing at 33,000 employees and set to rise to as high as 100,000 as the province grows and the sector takes on a larger role.

            Along with the newer cultural diversity reality of Manitoba, the non-profit sector also has to connect with youth as clients and as workers.  Stuart praises the MFNPO for its efforts to make training opportunities available around the province to sector workers, and to reach out to communities not necessarily included in the past.  Ultimately, she says, there needs to be a collective approach to workforce development.  People need to get the facts, understand the trends and work together on strategies to deal with future challenges.

 

            How government support, in the way of new streamlined procedures and longer-term funding, will impact on this process is still too early to tell.  And the level at which government will be willing to engage with the non-profit sector is still “yet to be determined”.  Says one government staffer:  The pilot projects are at an early stage and we don’t know yet what we will learn from them.  Says another:  We need to renew the process that got us started on this road and reconnect with our non-profit sector partners. 

            How the MFNPO’s efforts will impact on its own sector is a challenge that its leadership is undertaking.  Executive buy-in is key.  Can the leadership at the top levels of staff and Boards understand how planning needs to be done collectively to strengthen the sector - and that by strengthening the sector as a whole, they are ensuring the on-going success of their own organization to find the resources it needs, to do the administrative and programmatic work it was created for, and to benefit the people to whom it is dedicated?

             Only time will tell, and as one MFNPO leader suggests:  This is urgent.  We need to prepare for the future now.

Zack Gross has spent a forty-plus year career in the non-profit sector, from volunteer to Executive Director.  He has participated in national and provincial committees of the international development assistance movement, and of the overall non-profit sector

  • 2 months ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Provincial Initiative Could Streamline Non-Profit Administration, Benefit Programs

By Zack Gross

            In the Throne Speech, delivered in April of 2011, Manitoba Premier Greg Selinger committed his government to implementing a two-year four-point strategy that would stabilize funding and clear away red tape to the benefit of the non-profit sector, and therefore to the benefit of the vast majority of Manitobans, as they work for, volunteer with or are the clients of the programs and services of our sector.  Non-profits hope that this will be a long-term provincial commitment, rather than a short-term fix.

 

            “Non-profit groups are everyday heroes”, said Selinger at the time, “who help improve the quality of life for Manitobans.  They should be allowed to focus on programs not paperwork.”  The four-point strategy includes:

 

·      Piloting multi-year, multi-program funding with a few non-profits with a proven track record and then expanding this initiative after evaluation.  Methodology and criteria for evaluation will be key and non-profits hope for input into this process.

·      Creating a single-window application process for provincial funding and an on-line non-profit web portal.  Best practice advice could come from the model used by the Winnipeg Foundation.

·      Eliminating duplication in reporting requirements for organizations dealing with multiple provincial programs. Harmonization will take wisdom and courage but would be unique in Canada.

·      Helping organizations to save money by encouraging shared services such as legal, human resources and accounting.

 

The Manitoba Federation of Non-Profit Organizations (MFNPO) is a key partner in working with the province on these three pilot streamlining initiatives.  Along with changes that will help non-profits focus on programs instead of paperwork, MFNPO is also engaged with the province as a partner in delivering workforce planning and training, through Human Resources Hubs in Winnipeg and Thompson, skills training (two series), and labour market information collection and analysis.  A robust and sustainable non-profit sector will require on-going commitment.  Many don’t realize the size and value of the sector as an often under-funded, over-worked, passionate deliverer of programs and services in health, social support, immigrant and aboriginal concerns, youth projects and more.

 

            The sector believes that this financial process streamlining will save organizations untold hours in filling out applications and reports when they receive funding from several departments.  Stable, multi-year funding allows non-profits to plan long-term initiatives and to know their needs in terms of staffing, space and resources, while allowing them to build long-term relationships with their clientele.  This will make their programs more efficient and effective.  A one-stop shop and one-window application process would be a dream come true! That is the belief!!!!

 

            Beyond these promised nuts-and-bolts improvements in the way non-profits are funded and in how they apply and report, the MFNPO is seeking a long-term collaboration or engagement with the province that would see both sides work hand-in-hand to research, plan and deliver programs and services of benefit to Manitoba communities.  This means that the two sides, although both sincere about supporting the betterment of our society, but who conceive of delivery in quite different ways - and at times have been at loggerheads or just talking past one another - will have to seek ways to share planning and programming space.

 

            This is not easy for a “funder” and a “fundee” to pull off!  Nor do the various government departments or indeed the “grassroots” speak with one voice!  The direction that this effort might take could well be unique within Canada.  However, high quality and relevant programming cannot be delivered by the non-profit sector with not just a seat at the table, but also a voice that is valued.  To see the role and future of the sector in a long-term sustainable way, and to undertake the necessary research, planning, development and training to understand the province and its needs today and down the road – and meet those needs - the sector needs to engage with government on a regular basis and be respected as a partner.

 

            With a provincial election well past and new Ministers and staffs named, and with a major conference on the sector, the Collective Impact Colloquium, in the offing for MFNPO February 28th to March 2nd at the Canad Inns Fort Garry in Winnipeg, it is time to address the province’s commitment again, and make sure that words are followed by action.

 

Zack Gross has worked in the non-profit sector throughout a forty year career and has participated in several initiatives to improve our sector and Manitoba communities. He was awarded a Queen’s Golden Jubilee Medal in 2002 in recognition of his contribution to global and local development efforts.

 

  • 3 months ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

New Initiatives by Non-Profits the Product of Decade of Sector Development


By Zack Gross

           In today’s economic and social climate, Manitoba non-profits face many challenges.  First of all, there is the challenge of the issues that the non-profit sector deals with – poverty, health, immigration, literacy, the environment, youth, crime, and the list goes on and on.  Secondly, there is the issue of how non-profits deal with the administrative and funding challenges that pre-occupy them when they are really trying to get to that first set of issues.  Finally, there is always the question of ensuring the competence and sustainability of the sector, making certain that we know how to do our jobs, that the public trusts us, and that our sector can be sustained into a future that includes demographic, skill and cultural changes.

 

            To that end, MFNPO as a human resource sector council has worked tirelessly for more than a decade to explore and address these concerns. It started many years ago with the Manitoba Voluntary Sector Initiative (MVSI) and its Secretariat on Voluntary Sector Sustainability, and then continued with the Voluntary and Non-Profit Sector Organization of Manitoba and other related projects, which have conducted social and labour market research to determine what the key issues are facing people in our province, and how our sector can offer programs and services to its betterment.  These initiatives have also brought non-profit workers together in surveys and focus groups to get a perspective on the non-profit sector from people “in the trenches”.  And, finally, through conferences and workshops, the sector has forged agreements and alliances with labour, business and government to celebrate and plan the future role of non-profits in our society.

 

            A number of issues were identified in the first decade of the new millennium that impacted on the non-profit sector.  The change in the population’s work hours, from a 9 to 5 weekday society to much more shift and weekend work, and the fact that now both spouses in a relationship work full-time has meant great changes in the availability of working adults and parents to the sector.  The growth, particularly in cities, of aboriginal and immigrant populations, has meant a cultural change to how non-profits approach both their programs and their recruitment of volunteers.  Our sector, at that time and still today, was staffed largely by women – overworked, underpaid, undertrained and, therefore, often ready to move on, creating a revolving door at the staff entrance. 

 

Changes in technology have meant that non-profits are constantly struggling to upgrade equipment and train staff and volunteers.  Connecting with youth in a meaningful way necessitates finding out what role they want to play in our sector – what issues stir their passions and also what they expect from the “adult” age group.  Finally, rural, remote and northern non-profits experience extra challenges, with even less human and financial resources with which to confront the issues in their communities and their own development.

 

            In 2008, our provincial government stepped up its involvement in this process with a collaborative project, called the Non-Profit Labour Market Initiative, led by our Manitoba Federation of Non-Profit Organizations (MFNPO) in partnership with the Manitoba Bureau of Statistics, Department of Entrepreneurship, Training & Trade (ETT), and Other government departments, such as Health, Culture, Heritage & Tourism and Family Services & Housing were also connected to this process, along with The Winnipeg Foundation, the United Way of Winnipeg, the Manitoba Immigrant & Refugee Settlement Sector Association, the Aboriginal Council of Winnipeg and others.

 

            As the process has unfolded, aimed at strengthening first of all the health and social services side of the non-profit sector, partners have focused on our needs in training, recruitment and retention, and planning.  The commitment of government to this process has been welcomed as a sign of recognition of the key role played by the sector in daily life in the province, as an employer and as a service provider, and with the hope that there will be significant, timely and long-term benefit to the sector.

 

            It is to this backdrop, that the provincial government announced plans in the Throne Speech in April 2011 to engage with the non-profit sector in cutting red tape, offering stable funding, thus enabling organizations to focus on their reason for being, programs and services dedicated to the betterment of their constituencies.  What exactly the government’s announced commitment is will be addressed in the next article.

 

Zack Gross has worked in the non-profit sector throughout a forty year career and has participated in several initiatives to improve our sector and Manitoba communities.  He was awarded a Queen’s Golden Jubilee Medal in 2002 in recognition of his contribution to global and local development efforts.  

  • 3 months ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Beyond Nonprofit

By Jeusa Raflores

 “I see myself in a leadership position five years from now. It could still be in the nonprofit sector but if I had a choice, I would rather be in government because of the stability that exists,” says Chelsea Berezuk Training Coordinator  of Manitoba Construction Sector Council, a nonprofit organization committed to strengthening the skills of Manitoba’s construction sector workforce.

Chelsea, 25 would be in the prime of her career in a few more years and she says if everything was the same (compensation, benefits, pension plan) among the government sector, nonprofit sector, and private sector, she would choose to work in the nonprofit sector. “I believe I can help more people here,” she declares.

Despite this belief, Chelsea is one of many individuals who would rather work for a different sector specifically the government. “The government has a union and you can’t lose a job as easily because there is a process that has to be undergone and in the nonprofit sector, when funds are cut, in an instant, you could end up jobless.”

Chelsea adds that the government covers employee pension plan and other extra benefits. Chelsea gleefully shares though that starting Monday February 20, she will be getting benefits. “We have been working on this and it has finally come!,” she exclaims.

But not all nonprofit employees are as lucky. In a discussion paper entitled “The State of Health of the Non-profit/Voluntary Sector in Nova Scotia by Gardner Pinfold (2010), a cited 2008 national study reveals that the more common small-sized nonprofit organization (with less than 10 employees), has an average of 60.8% employers providing employee benefits that cover: prescription drug plan, dental care, other medical coverage, life and/or disability insurance, vision care, and Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) contribution. Meanwhile, 34.9% of nonprofit employers give a pension plan or pension plan contribution.This means that an average of 40% of nonprofit organization employees do not get benefits, and an average of 65% do not get RRSP contribution a pension plan, or pension plan contribution.

With these statistics, Chelsea’s vision may not be an isolated one especially with the government sector giving benefit programs that include the Ambulance & Hospital Semi-Private (AHSP), Dental, Vision, Prescription Drugs, Extended Health, Travel Health, Long-Term Disability (LTD) plans and Health Spending Account. This is in addition to the Registered Retirement Savings Plan meant to promote savings for retirement.

 

While Chelsea and most other nonprofit sector employees find more meaning and reward in providing human services that impact everyone’s quality of life, their own quality of life must not be ignored.

 

Hopefully, nonprofit employees would still see themselves or wish to be in the nonprofit sector five or ten years from now. In this way, human services will continue to be provided and it will be truly for all.

 

Jeusa Raflores is an Instructor and tutor at Workplace Education Manitoba, and a building facilitator for the Alliance of Manitoba Sector Councils.  She also does freelance research and writing in addition to being a reading specialist.

  • 3 months ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Living on Less: A Choice or Misfortune?

 

By Jeusa Raflores

She wears a knitted maroon sweater, showing some wear. She has gray slacks and flat shoes—nothing fancy, not in any way close to stylish office get up.

With white hair and bangs that touches her black eye glasses, she smiles and talks about affordable housing in Winnipeg. She grabs the Home section of a newspaper, shows and explains bank and credit union interest rates and then she gets another bunch of real estate magazines, explains more, and offers that you take the magazines home for more reading. And then, she will grab a marker and write on a white board explaining how a thirty-year interest could kill you.

She explains everything in detail, looking at you in the eye, and with a sweet smile and a voice of conviction that exhibits expertise on the subject.

It is only a matter of time before you realize that you are talking to a woman of passion and dedication to work. She shows real concern, she epitomizes commitment.

When she educates and guides you on your quest to find your own dwelling, you will feel like you’ve known her for long or that she is family. She would discuss in detail the process of attaining and retaining decent affordable housing in Winnipeg, even relating her own experiences living at the heart of downtown— along Young Street. She would give photocopies of information she has collected and explain each one carefully, making sure you understand her as she knows English is not the normal first language of newcomers.

Her name is Karen Giesbrecht, Housing Advisor of New Journey Housing Resource center, a non-profit organization established to assist and train newcomers as they search for decent, affordable housing.

Karen is 60 and has helped people most of her life through nonprofit organizations such as Spence Neighborhood Association and Habitat for Humanity.

 “I like helping people to understand and make use of government grants and other programs that assist low-income learners,” she says.

In a couple of years though, she might be retiring and she declares, “I have learned to live on little, so I am not afraid.” Karen explained that she has not gotten any extra pension or benefit from nonprofit organizations she worked for. “I just have CPP and Old Age Security, and I try to prepare for my retirement as much as I can.”

Karen believes that if nonprofit sector employees would get additional benefits and pension, only half as many beneficiaries of nonprofit organization projects would get funded. And so she says, “I have accepted whatever compensation package offered by nonprofit organizations because even if there is not a lot of money, I like to help. When I retire, I will just live on less.”

Like Michael Owen, retired President and Chief Executive Officer of the Boys and Girls Clubs of Winnipeg, who served kids in poor economic areas and provided kids with different activities, scholarships, recreational and leadership trainings, sport events, and the like, Karen believes that working for the nonprofit sector is “a choice.”

“Even if we spend time dedicated to work and contribute to society, people are unaware of that contribution that is why we are not that recognized…It is sad, but we chose this life,” Michael Owen confirms.

Karen and Michael are just two of many nonprofit retirees/soon retirees who have come to the conclusion that nonprofit organization work is a sacrifice. Getting good compensation, pension, and benefits is a privilege or rather a challenge to acquire, and so living on less even until retirement is a choice made upon working for the nonprofit sector.

But once Karen and the few others like her who seem content with their upcoming retirement finally do retire, who will fill their shoes?  

 

In a survey done by the National HR Council on Non Profits in 2008 entitled “Toward a Labour Force Strategy for Canada’s Voluntary & Non-Profit Sector” it was found that of those employees who were looking for a new job, 41 per cent mentioned

dissatisfaction with salary as their primary reason.

 

Another research by McLean, Linda (2006) entitled “Sustaining Passion and Commitment: An Examination of Staff”  “Non-profit employees consistently rank satisfaction with intrinsic rewards as high; however, they consistently rank satisfaction with extrinsic rewards as low.”

 

In a perfect world, many people might be waiting to replace people like Karen and fulfill their community dreams however, in an imperfect world with people who have their own needs for security, what awaits the future of the nonprofit sector?

Jeusa Raflores is an Instructor and tutor at Workplace Education Manitoba, and a building facilitator for the Alliance of Manitoba Sector Councils.  She also does freelance research and writing in addition to being a reading specialist.

 

  • 3 months ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Telling Our Stories of the Nonprofit Sector

Innovation Stories is a continuing MFNPO initiative dedicated to telling stories about the community-based human services component of the Manitoba nonprofit sector.  In the coming months, citizen reporters will trek through organizations to investigate and develop stories that highlight the learning  taking place in addressing need and transforming how our nonprofit sector operates.

This initiative will go beyond  a mainstream media focus on clients, and go deeper into the organizations themselves. Changes are taking place, especially with innovative leaders who move from a charity mindset to social investment culture, pioneer distinct responses to rural, northern and Aboriginal communities, manage workforce challenges and sustain the sector despite financial barriers. We are interested in how community organizations already work in collaboration and can continue to do so.

Reflect with us as we document stories that go beyond the norm, stories that describe the novel experiment  taking place in trying to better deliver human services to Manitobans across the province.

The next two stories are about the MFNPO convening a full day session with the HR Council by inviting the Manitoba provincial government to learn from the BC government’s experience through the Government Nonprofit Initiative.

Government is not “The Borg”

“The Government is not like the Borg,” said Heather Dickson with a broad smile. Unlike the fictional  cybernetic organisms that menace the Star Trek universe, “government departments have different mandates and cultures,” said Dickson, explaining that contrary to the views of many in the non-profit sector, governments are not monolithic, cohesive or unified.

Dickson, a former British Columbia provincial government ADM who ran the BC Government Nonprofit Initiative (GNPI),  was in Winnipeg Sept. 20 to participate in a workshop entitled Provincial Governments and Non-Profit Sector Relations in the 21st Century – Challenges and Possibilities – Manitoba and British Columbia. With her on the panel was Sid Frankel, Manitoba Federation of Non-Profit Organizations member, associate professor of social work at the University of Manitoba and a director of the Social Planning Council of Winnipeg.

They began by discussing how the nonprofit sector can help the government “do its job better.”

Drawing on her rich experience working with BC`s non-profit sector, which includes seven years as provincial chair of the Canada-BC Labour Market Development Agreement Management Committee, Dickson said that nonprofits have to “appreciate what government is going through” and understand that while “nonprofits are disparate – so is government.”

Picking up on this theme, panellist Sid Frankel observed that government confronts three problems: a lack of “knowledge in action,” insufficient resources in a “low tax, small government culture,” and low public esteem.

In most policy areas, Frankel said, government knowledge is research-based and “the experts disagree” on many questions — “for example, who should be trained for what job, or child care or child welfare.” The missing element, according to Frankel, is the “tacit knowledge” or “knowledge in action” possessed by the non-profit sector.

Frankel said the non-profit sector is positioned to help government offset its resource challenges by identifying strategic investments that government can make. In the public’s eye, he said, government suffers from “a legitimation problem.” In contrast, nonprofits enjoy broad popular support and can help government “build legitimation” for its programs.

Dickson said that the shift to third-party delivery of services means that “expertise no longer resides in government.” She described this shift as “huge” and said it is important that nonprofits understand the difficulty this poses for government and the “sense of threat” felt by “some government people.” She noted that while nonprofits are charged with program delivery, governments are responsible to the citizenry as well as to the clients of these programs. The clients are “their shared common ground.”

Dickson cautioned that when nonprofits “stand on their higher moral ground” it suggests that government has “lower moral standing.” This can cause some government people to “shut down” and therefore harms non-profit sector-government relations.

Nonprofit sector is economically significant, but faces challenges

“Non-profit organizations need to begin thinking of themselves in business case terms,” says Heather Dickson, the former provincial chair of the Canada-BC Labour Market Development Agreement Management Committee.

Speaking at a joint session of the Boards of the Manitoba Federation of Non-Profit Organizations (MFNPO) and the HR Council for the Nonprofit Sector, Sept. 20, Dickson said “there is a business case because of your size and prevalence in delivering government services,” adding it was necessary to “present yourselves as an equal partner, rather than [merely] a funded program.”

Dickson’s observation was underscored by data presented by MFNPO co-chair Martin Itzkow, who said that the Manitoba non-profit sector consists of 8,200 community-based organizations that employ approximately 100,000 people. “Together, we account for 6 percent of provincial GDP,” he said.

Itzkow suggested that the non-profit sector in Manitoba faces major challenges in the areas of labour market intelligence, skills development, finding ways to enhance the collective impact of all participants in the sector and securing sustainable funding for all labour market programs.

Bonnie Shiell, the HR Council’s research manager, underlined the need for better labour market data.  “Labour market information is poor,” she said, adding that “we need [both] data [and] the people to interpret it.”

This need will be addressed, in part, by a Statistics Canada survey of the non-profit sector that is to be conducted in 20012. As well, she said that the HR Council would be launching a new study in the next few months to model labour supply and demand for the non-profit sector. The target for completing this initiative is March 2013.

The challenges faced by the Manitoba non-profit sector are mirrored across Canada. According to Shiell, “Recruitment and retention are chronic challenges [and will be] more so in the future” with the main competition for personnel coming from government. For Shiell, this points to the need for the  integration of HR management in overall strategic planning.

For Heather Dickson, meeting these challenges requires a businesslike approach. “Productivity, research & development and investment – these are important to business and should be to the non-profit sector, as well,” she said.

“Add to that – innovation,” said Kelly Holmes, executive director of Resource Assistance for Youth, who summarized the mood of the discussion by observing “we have to be smarter than the problem.”

 

  • 5 months ago
  • 1
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

You’re Invited…

WHAT?

Join us to celebrate the success of our Manitoba Social Innovation Stories Project and for the launch of phase two of this initiative: a brand new bi-monthly series of public forums on a range of topics inspired by social innovation.

Be Inspired:

Listen to Manitoba social innovators share stories about how their work is transforming the non-profit sector in Manitoba today.

Speed-Dating for Social Change:

Speed-dating is not just for the loveless and lonely… it’s a powerful networking tool that innovator’s can use to supercharge connections for social transformation. Bring your big ideas and get ready to make a match!

Join the Conversation:

Innovation starts at the grass-roots and is nurtured through dialogue. The proposed bi-monthly series of innovation forums will provide a platform for citizens to share ideas and mobilize for social change. We want to hear your ideas about how to make this series exciting and relevant.

WHEN?

Tuesday, June 28th. From 6pm-8:30pm

WHERE?

Social Planning Council

300 - 207 Donald Street (corner of Donald and St. Mary Avenue) Winnipeg, MB

WHY?

Last year, the Manitoba Federation of Nonprofit Organizations Inc. in partnership with the Canadian Non-Profit Innovator’s Network launched the Social Innovation Stories Project to engage Manitobans in a conversation about the role of social innovation in building and sustaining a vibrant civil society in our province.

Our blog is one of our tools and through this blog we have been highlighting social innovations in Manitoba and beyond: from stories on alternative urban food-systems to social inclusion programs for newcomers; from innovative aboriginal youth leadership programs in Winnipeg’s inner-city, to social-enterprise and alternative financing models.

Beginning this September, the Manitoba Federation of Nonprofit Organizations wants to bring these stories to life. We are initiating a bi-monthly series of public forums that we hope will provide a space for citizens, and social innovators of all stripes to come together and incubate ideas for social change. Think TEDtalks only less elitist and more fun!

Join us on June 28th as we kick off Phase Two of the Manitoba Social Innovation Stories Project. Learn more about our plans for our social innovation forum and how you can get involved. We’ll open the night with a fun and informal “Speed Dating for Social Change” networking session to get the innovation juices flowing. A few short presentations from some of our project partners will give a taste of what to expect from the Manitoba Social Innovation Stories Project in the coming year. Light refreshments and big ideas will be the order of the day.

Come one and all!

For more information and to RSVP to this event, contact Helen Burston at the Social Planning Council: HBurston@spcw.mb.ca or (204) 943-2561

  • 12 months ago
  • 1
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Growing Alternative Food Systems in Manitoba

Key Innovation Concepts
  • Alternative approaches to land use and ownership in Manitoba are transforming food systems and leading to new ways for communities to access food.
  • Finding ways to work around the barriers presented by traditional notions of land use and ownership requires groups and communities be nimble and open to challenging established rules. Groups like the Landless Farmers Collective and Winnipeg’s urban community gardening movement can teach us an important lesson in cultivating an organizational culture that embraces limits as a source of innovation.
By: Anna Weier

Food and land are intimately intertwined. In a day and age where land is becoming more expensive to own, where small-scale farmers usually need off farm income to make ends meet and where the industrial food system is destroying the land, innovative ways of producing and sharing food are essential. We are entrenched in a food system where many urbanized eaters are so disconnected from the food they eat that they do not know where it has come from, how it has been produced and who has produced it. However, there are many amazing examples of projects that treat land more respectfully and communally and it is these examples that lead the way towards a more sustainable food system.

Take for example the Landless Farmers Collective (LFC). Their name tells much of the story. They are a small group of people who work together and farm land in order to make a livelihood and in order to produce food. The difference between them and other farmers is that they do not own land or produce food in a conventional way. They are currently farming land in urban Winnipeg and they get around and make their deliveries using pedal power. “There is a cultural belief that you need to be a land owner in order to be a food producer and it is important for us to demonstrate that that is not true. It’s especially important that new farmers know that it is possible to farm without owning land” says Coral Maloney of the LFC.

LFC is also involved in community supported agriculture (CSA). At the beginning of every year, community members are invited to purchase shares in the farm entitling them to a box of fresh vegetables every week throughout the growing season. This ensures that the eaters share the risk and the bounty of farming. If it is a bad year for tomatoes, then the eaters just get to eat fewer tomatoes and the farmers are not out a bunch of money because they did not have tomatoes to sell. The shareholders not only share the risk, they also share the benefit in years of plenty, getting bins overfull of lush, delicious and healthy produce. This innovative way of sharing the responsibility of the land and what it produces is a great example of ways that eaters and growers can work together for greater food security and sense of community.

LFC not only builds community between eaters and food producers, they also build community in the neighbourhood where they farm. “We don’t live right next door to the space (that we farm), but we feel like it’s important to respect the cultural realities of that neighbourhood. We respect the desire lines (pathways made from repeated use) that have been there for years. We design our garden shapes in ways that will make people feel invited to use those spaces. We plant cherry tomatoes and nice smelling plants and plants that people will recognize so that they feel more welcomed to use those paths” explains Coral, a member of the Landless Farmers Collective.

Community gardening is another form of innovative land use. These gardens are often located on unused or underused city owned land or on privately owned vacant lots. They provide garden space for growing food to people who live in apartments or houses with small yards who do not have access to land. Having community gardens on vacant land prioritizes people who steward the land by providing food to those who put their energy into the garden plots. Unfortunately, property laws do not always favour the workers of the land. Robyn Webb of the Daniel McIntyre/St. Matthews Community Association and the Urban Greenspaces Coalition was excited to receive funding for a research project to explore alternative forms of land tenure: “So much investment has already been made into our community gardens, we now need to look for ways to make sure these spaces have more secure tenure.”

In Winnipeg, the Urban Greenspaces Coalition is trying to secure access to community garden lots through another innovative land use: land trusts. Land trusts can work in many different ways but the main idea is that the land is owned collectively or by a steward for a certain use that does not involve profit. There have been land trusts where the land has been designated as conservation land or as community land. Land trusts usually are created to ensure the use of the land rather than the owner of the land. In a day in age where land is governed by individual or corporate owners with the desire to turn a profit rather than meet community needs, land trusts are a great example of an innovative land use that brings the land and the control back to the community.

The term innovation implies something new, but innovative ideas can also be old ideas that when in practice help to repair broken parts of the mainstream food system. In many indigenous communities in Manitoba, traditional foods like moose or deer are hunted and shared with families and community members, especially elders or families who do not have anyone else to hunt for them, rather than being kept solely for the private gain of the hunter. This way of sharing challenges a more mainstream view of ownership over food. Food that can be hunted or gathered can be used without owning the land, and hunters and gatherers practicing traditional methods act as stewards of the land. Models based on hunting, gathering and sharing can be very challenging to mainstream land use systems because they do not reinforce ideas of ownership.

Innovative approaches to land use in Manitoba are making it possible to recreate our food system in a way where all people have access to healthy, delicious, culturally appropriate food and where people have control over their food. There are many great examples of people growing, hunting or gathering their own food or food for their communities, but in order for this alternative food system to work, everyone needs to get involved with innovative ways of changing what we eat.

    • #food systems
    • #community
    • #collaboration
  • 1 year ago
  • 4
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Embracing the Cloud: How social media is changing the way non-profits work

By: Whitney Light

In a keynote delivered at the 2009 Connecting Up Australia conference, engineer and digital futurist Mark Pesce ventured that the task of non-profit organizations this century would be to “look more like a cloud.” In his model, the cloud refers to the amorphous network fostered by social media in all its forms, the storm is the cloud’s potential when it gathers momentum and resilience, and the tower is its opposite—the hierarchical organization we already know. There is no way out of this task, Pesce argues, because whether we realize it or not everyone is already halfway invested in the cloud. And that should spur innovation, not fear. As non-profits engage the applications of Web 2.0, they will configure their organizations to take the best of both old and new ways of working. They will release some of their control over “message discipline” and embrace the authenticity that comes of letting everyone in the organization and the wider community exchange ideas and information.

In Winnipeg, some non-profits already have embraced this new model and others are grappling with its implementation. These organizations are rethinking how inter-generational collaboration impacts them and how the younger and tech savvy set can help harness the cloud. Among the most successful so far are Siloam Mission and The Winnipeg Foundation. Both have leapt with both feet into blogs, Twitter, Facebook and more, resulting in more powerful connections and nimbler responses to the communities they service. I spoke with Siloam Mission Communications Coordinator Mike Duerksen, The Winnipeg Foundation’s Social Media Convener Jenette Martens, and Erica Glasier, a local expert in social media training for non-profits, to get their perspectives on the advantages and challenges of reconciling the tower and the cloud.

First, our experts seem to agree that for non-profits wondering whether to get involved, the answer is an emphatic yes, and not only because of the obvious and still growing ubiquity of social media. As Glasier points out, a 2010 study conducted by Convio, Edge Research and Sea Change Studies called “The Next Generation of American Giving” suggested that nearly everyone (84% among study participants, from Generation Y back to the Boomers and beyond) feels that peer-to-peer asking is “the most appropriate solicitation channel.” The significance of that, for Glasier, is that “social media turbocharges the peer-to-peer ask.” To be sure, the connections that it fosters may not be as strong as ones based on face-to-face exchanges and friendships. As writer Malcolm Gladwell argued last fall in The New Yorker, for that very reason “the revolution will not be tweeted.” But that doesn’t mean it isn’t already helping all manner of causes and projects gather necessary support through small, incremental gestures. “People like to give to help a friend reach their goal,” says Glasier. “Why wouldn’t you donate $2 or $5 to current local or global needs when your social sphere asks you to?” Indeed, by engaging in social media now, non-profits stand to benefit from and help grow what is becoming a powerful model for funding in the 21st century.

Direct giving, of course, is not the only or, in many cases, even the main goal of nuturing the cloud. More generally, Glasier adds, “if [a non-profit], their donors or their clients would benefit from direct conversations, organizations should make themselves available for them.” In some cases, it might take a step into the world of social media before it becomes clear what these benefits are. Mike Duerksen, for instance, suggests rather a modest goal for Siloam’s social media. He wants to increase awareness of struggles and challenges in the inner city, and these media have proved on a number of occaisons to have facilitated fast and concrete support that would have been nearly impossible otherwise. During a recent food shortage in its meal program, Siloam posted and tweeted about their urgent needs, and the cloud responded. “The response was so great that food donations started rolling in that same afternoon and continued to come in the next day,” Duerksen says. “We could have put out a news release or taken out an ad in the paper or radio, but the story would have run in the evening or even the next day.”

To get those kinds of results took some planning. Duerksen and Jenette Martens agree that not everyone at their organizations has yet grasped the style or content of communications appropriate for short bursts of information or feels keen to participate. Yet, especially at Siloam, involving as many staff and volunteers as possible to create many points of contact between the organization and the community has been critical to its success. While Duerksen and other staff/volunteers under 25 years old oversee content delivery, the ideas are gathered daily from every department. Pics and news bites are then posted to the organization’s various channels, facilitating immediate responses from donors, journalists and other contacts, as well as increased internal communication, an oft-overlooked facet of social media’s potential. “It’s opened up lines of communication that weren’t there before,” says Duerksen.

Siloam Mission is quickly morphing from tower to cloud, in a way that Duerksen suggests has only strengthened its ability to act upon its mandate. While similar progress is happening at The Winnipeg Foundation, Marten’s experience as dedicated Social Media Convenor speaks more to the challenge of reconciling message discipline with the chaotic world of social media. To what extent an organization can open up and introduce multiple, changing voices to its dialogue in the cloud is a question any social media strategy must address. Martens emphasizes that she works closely with senior staff to ensure all the organization’s communications are consistent: “My job is to tell the same story, but to do it in a way that works with social media.”

So far, this somewhat more conservative approach has worked for the Foundation. Both it and Siloam Mission have managed to avoid what Glasier calls the number one mistake of non-profits new to new media: jargon. “It’s so tough to know you’re committing it,” she points out. “And it leads to the number two mistake: being boring.” Having a solid strategy in place before they started helped Siloam avoid both problems. They decided upon eight themes, complete with examples, which provided a framework for all future messages. Tweets and status updates fall into categories like “Dreams and Aspirations,” for example, or “Did you know?” and “Dispelling Myths of Homelessness.” “When people tangibly saw what our communication on social media would look like, they warmed up to the idea of contributing,” says Duerksen.

Despite being without a dedicated convener, Siloam seems to have managed to integrate social media into existing positions, creating an internal chain that keeps it abreast of the online world’s demands. But how staff will find the time and energy to maintain its networks is an important and not easily answered question. “In order to maintain the cloud, and our presence within it,” wrote Pesce, “we are beholden to it. We must maintain each of the social relationships, each of the informational relationships, each of the knowledge relationships and each of the mimetic relationships within the cloud. Without that constant activity, the cloud dissipates, evaporating into nothing at all.”

That might sound like a pretty tall order for a resource-strapped non-profit. Still, it’s also the case that putting time into social media could very well translate into greater efficiency and nimbleness in areas beyond just publicity and audience engagement. Martens admits that before her position was created, no one was able to focus, for example, on its Twitter account to the extent that she does now. “It would have been difficult for others to engage with us through that channel,” she says. “It’s not something you can set aside five minutes for three times a day.” At least, not if you expect to see dynamic problem solving, cues to adapt activity or audience engagement.

But this time and energy issue really comes down to a question of commitment and focus. It’s about welcoming the hyperconnectivity of social networks and allowing it to change the way an organization works. Traditional media such as print and TV, as Duerksen points out, will always have a role for communicating big, overarching, seasonal messages. But they will never create the immediate and game-changing effects of social media. For Martens, social media increases her ability to monitor and exchange ideas about the slate of projects across the city that the Foundation supports. For Duerksen, it allows Siloam to create awareness and response on a -40 degree night that people are sitting outside because there’s no room left at the shelter. Or, as Glasier suggests, it’s making the work that non-profits do more transparent to donors: “When a donor sees what they’ve achieved, it by-passes all the complicated explanations, social-worker speak, unsexy realities and political correctness that bogs down non-profit communications. It speaks to the heart.”

    • #Social media
    • #culture
    • #organization
    • #management
    • #communications
  • 1 year ago
  • 3
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Social Innovation in Food Security Organizations: Getting to the roots of a trend in funding

By: Bowen Smyth

If you are in the non-profit sector, it probably comes as no surprise to hear that funders are interested in new programs, as Liz Wolff of New Directions identifies in a CBC article from January of this year. Funding for non-profit food justice organizations is no different; the newest bird catches the worm, so to speak.

In response to the trend of spending on social and other forms of innovation, non-profit organizations are coming up with innovative titles and messaging to spice up their grant applications. The irony is that social innovation—as recognized by funders and those removed from grassroots work—is often nothing more than a facelift for the same programs that have been successful for years.

Take, for example, The Stop Community Food Centre in Toronto. One of Canada’s oldest food banks, it incorporated as a non-profit in 1982, and now offers many additional services including a drop-in, perinatal program, bake ovens and markets, a greenhouse, sustainable food systems education, and community advocacy. Many of these services involve intergenerational as well as intercultural exchanges among community members; program participants come from 32 countries, and speak 16 languages.

In spite of The Stop’s history of success, it has recently been recognized in the Globe and Mail for its “innovative approach.” Undoubtedly a remarkable food justice non-profit, the only confusion is in how and when an organization like The Stop gets elevated to the status of “innovative.” Does it have to do with image and marketing strategies? Is it a matter of getting the right people to notice your good work: the people with the authority to herald it as innovative, or to grace it with stable financial support?

Charles Levkoe, a PhD student studying food networks at the University of Toronto, spoke at a Brown Bag Lunch series hosted by Food Matters Manitoba on March 3rd. More than 20 people from various non-profit and for-profit food organizations came to hear Levkoe speak about The Stop’s organizational strategies and models.

During Levkoe’s week-long visit in Winnipeg, he met with and interviewed several program coordinators, executive directors, and other key players among our non-profit food security organizations. Since his research extends across Canada, I was curious to know if any of our Manitoban programs and activities might count as social innovation.

However, Levkoe is hesitant to embrace the concept of social innovation, suggesting that “a lot of the stuff happening in Manitoba is the same as what’s happening everywhere else, which is the antithesis of social innovation. For example, Growing Up Organic …exists all over Canada, but it’s a little bit different in each province. Context is important,” Levkoe says. “The Stop plunked into downtown Winnipeg probably wouldn’t work.”

Arguing that innovation seems to be a recent trend, similar to the emphasis on synergy several years ago, Levkoe questions, “What does synergy mean? It just means working together. We need to be clear on what we’re actually talking about.”

So what are we talking about when it comes to social innovation? Is it, like synergy, a longer or more stylish way of referring to a simple concept?

“In simple terms, innovation can be defined as that which is new: a new idea, method, or product. Social innovation therefore is essentially about defining new ideas, methods, and outcomes associated with the way we organize and manage our interactions as individuals and communities within society.” (Matthew Koop-Pearce, via)

Non-profit organizations are aware that funds are predominantly doled out for new, or “innovative” programs. Very few funders are eager to pay for anything as dull as rent, office supplies, payroll, or even successful programs that are no longer new. Non-profit organizations are expected to provide meaningful services without the long-term stability needed to offer their programs.

And yet, while many non-profit organizations remain in a constant precarious financial state, they may be seen as leaders in social innovation. When limited funds are stretched further than usual, it may inspire creative solutions to common problems. As Matthew mentions in an earlier post,

“Non-profits are the natural innovators because they operate in a culture or climate that requires they do more with less.”

Is it strange, then, that in the shared office space where I work, I often hear the motto “do less with less?” This is not a humourous saying taken from a de-motivational poster; it is serious advice offered to non-profit organizations on the Blue Avocado blog. While this advice is intended to be more sustainable than its alternative “doing more with less,” how practical is such advice in reality?

Rhonda Lorch, organizational effectiveness consultant and Food Matters Manitoba board member, admits that doing less with less can be a challenging shift in thought and practice.

“This truly is a tough concept for us nonprofit workers because our resources have been historically tight and we take pride in accomplishing a lot with few resources,” says Lorch. “It is really helpful, especially for Executive Directors, to realize that if you don’t have the resources, nobody is going to fault you for not doing the work. And when I’m talking resources, I’m not just talking money - it applies to human resources as well.

For many non-profit organizations, the reality of limited resources means limited capacity in terms of the services offered. Existing funding models tend to be backwards in that non-profit organizations must tailor their programs to match a funder’s preferences, rather than a community’s needs.

Funding models that reward innovative or new ideas can be useful, but if the largest proportion of grants goes towards new projects, what are we sacrificing? If we encourage non-profit organizations to continually reinvent the wheel, to start from scratch in order to receive financial reward, this ensures that non-profit organizations remain dependent on funders.

Consider the same situation in the private sector. If a business had to rebrand itself once a year or more, how could it be expected to succeed? Anyone can start up a new company, but it requires successful management to sustain that company.

Innovation is obviously an important quality, and one that should continue to be funded. However, like anything, balance is the key to success. In our excitement for social innovation, we can’t neglect the non-profit programs or organizations that demonstrate long-term viability and dedicated commitment to their communities.

Perhaps, even more than asking ourselves what innovation means, we need to consider, What are we innovating for? Levkoe cautions against “innovation for innovation’s sake,” which seems wise advice considering the funding context in which our non-profit organizations are currently working.

While Levkoe may not rate our food security work in terms of innovation, he is not hesitant to praise our efforts. “There’s something really important about the passion and dedication, and the openness to critique [in Manitoba] that to me is really inspiring.”

    • #Food Systems
    • #Manitoba
    • #Innovation
    • #Government
    • #Funding
  • 1 year ago
  • 5
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Up Next teaches principles of leadership rooted in Aboriginal culture

By: Josiah Neufeld

Everyone is shoeless, sitting in a circle around a pair of shaggy buffalo rugs. The sharp scent of sage smoke from a ceremonial smudge still hangs in the air. As the talking stick makes its way from hand to hand around the circle, the young men and women speak openly about what they’ve learned over the past two months: how to listen, how to be more open, where they come from as First Nations people. All of them have affectionate words for the teachers who have guided them: John Kent, May Louise Campbell, Jo Jo Sutherland and David Budd. These are well-known names in Winnipeg—respected teachers of First Nations culture, language and tradition. All of them are committed to passing this learning on to the next generation.

Each young participant around the circle is given a braid of sweetgrass and a deerhide pouch fastened with a birchbark button to symbolize the knowledge they now carry with them.

The ceremony, hosted by the Native Women’s Transition Centre, marks the completion of the first part of a two-part program designed to train young Aboriginal leaders for leadership in the non-profit sector. The program is called Up Next, and this is its pilot year.

“How do you take cultural knowledge and apply it to your life?” asks Brian McLeod who was hired to help set up the program. McLeod is among a group of veterans of the non- profit sector who have been asking themselves for quite some time who’s going to take up the torch of leadership once they retire.

“We wanted to pass on the knowledge of working in a community together—the stuff you never learn in school,” says McLeod. Aboriginal culture is rich in knowledge about how to lead in effective and sensitive ways. The seven sacred teachings, for instance, or the medicine wheel, have much to teach about management and good governance.

“People have spent years developing this knowledge and skills. If we don’t pass it on we’ll lose it,” says McLeod.

Between January and March participants met every Wednesday during the day to share their stories, listen to the teachings of elders, study the history of Canada’s first people and participate in ceremonies such as sweat lodges and sharing circles.

The second part of the program begins April 12 and wraps up in July. Part two will focus on skills like fundraising, management and community relations—and how to do those tasks in ways that are rooted in Aboriginal identity and culture. A few spots are still open for young people interested in joining.

Listening without judgment

“The most important thing I learned is that everyone needs healing in order to move forward,” says Dana Riccio, program support manager at the Ma Mawi Wi Chi Itata Centre. Riccio can already see how things she’s learning at Up Next are making her a better leader.

“It has helped me in way I interact with youth,” Riccio says. “It teaches me to listen without judgment. Of course we always listen to our youth, but we always want to find the solution right away. Sometimes listening is the solution.”

Riccio says the sharing circles have been powerful experiences. Talking about their identities and sharing their own stories was a profound place to start, she says. People told difficult stories. Some shed tears.

“We all had stuff that really bound us,” says Riccio. “But when you can sit and cry and show pain in front of strangers….This has allowed me to forgive a lot of what’s happened to me in the past.”

Will Hudson also says he’s undergone a change. The experience has helped him become a more caring leader, he says.

“Before I just looked at the end goal, now I’ve started to look at the people beside me,” Hudson says.

Hudson also works with youth at Ma Mawi. And he coaches a community team of nine- year-old hockey players. This year Hudson’s team, the Norquay Knights made local headlines after Hudson coached a group of rookies—some of whom started the season barely able to skate—all the way to the playoffs.

Hudson says his coaching style has been affected by what he’s learned through Up Next. He used to be intense and goal oriented; now he pays a lot more attention to the real people under the hockey helmets.

And he has met a group of caring mentors. That was clear during the closing ceremonies when Hudson took a moment to thank each of his teachers by name for what they had given to him. “I fell as though they’re like my grandmothers and grandfathers I didn’t even know I had,” he says.

Though Hudson is Aboriginal, he didn’t grow up with traditional teachings. In fact his father referred to cultural practices like smudging as “that voodoo stuff.” Hudson says what he’s learned so far is incredibly valuable. He also feels as though he’s just barely scratched the surface.

“As Aboriginal people, we want the same things everyone else wants: self-governance, self determination,” says McLeod. He’s proud to see Up Next equipping young Aboriginal leaders to make that a reality.

Dan Gange, project coordinator for Up Next, says organizers are working with the University of Winnipeg to certify the curriculum in the hopes that it can one day be offered for credit in the university’s Continuing Education department. The program received funding for its first year from the Department of Canadian Heritage, Aboriginal and Northern Affairs and the Winnipeg Foundation.

    • #Leadership
  • 1 year ago
  • 1
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Four Key Innovations of the Coop Model

By: Tara Walker

I’ve spent most of my career (so far) in the non-profit sector and I’ve come to believe the non-profit model is eroding. Hamstrung by systemic HR challenges and over-reliance on public funds, many non-profits are failing to evolve. I believe the sector’s leaders could move past some of these barriers by borrowing innovations from the fourth sector where profit/non-profit hybrids are flourishing.

I’m excited by what I found in Manitoba’s highly developed co-operative sector. Supported by a responsive provincial government and deep roots, co-ops are driving innovation in food and agriculture, environmental sustainability and delivery of community services. At the same time, they are remaining true to their co-op principles and succeeding economically. The co-op model might have been around for 200 years but its ability to meet dual business and social objectives make it especially relevant today. In fact, the UN has declared 2012 the international year of co-operatives. I believe we can apply key innovations in the co-op model to transform many non-profits.

FOUR KEY INNOVATIONS IN THE CO-OP MODEL

  1. Participatory Decision-making / Group leadership:

    Having only experienced the hierarchical structures of non-profits, I was curious to know how co-ops manage decision-making under group-based leadership. My assumption was that wrangling many stakeholders to make decisions would slow down progress. My contacts in the co-op community challenged that by pointing out that co-ops work out their governance with their members during their inception so disagreements don’t stall their growth.

    Worker co-ops, for instance, strive for consensus, according to Hazel Corcoran of Canadian Worker Co-op Federation. Harnessing the intelligence of the whole group of owner-workers leads to an environment of constant improvements and innovation. When the group is single-mindedly motivated to achieve the goals of the co-op, they take their democratic duties and commitment to co-operation seriously.

    Hazel also pointed out that the survival rate of co-ops is higher than that of traditional businesses. A 2008 study in Quebec found that 62% of new co-ops are still operating after five years and 44% after 10 years, compared with 35% and 20% for other new businesses. (LINK: Co-op Association of Canada: http://www.coopscanada.coop/en/about_co-operative/Co-op-Facts-and-Figures)

    Many non-profits could benefit from adopting more participatory decision-making. Instead of a highly empowered board and lead staff person making the bulk of decisions for the staff to carry out and members to learn about later, co-ops show that flattening the power structure pays off. More inclusively enhances input from younger members of the staff, prepares leaders for future development, tempers unrealistic expectations, spreads the workload, increases a shared sense of ownership and boosts innovation by deepening the idea pool. It would also help prepare our organizations to adjust to the values of the millennial generation who are for the most part more inclusive and community-minded.

  2. Engagement through accountability and transparency:

    It’s a challenge for many non-profits to maintain the focus of the people we serve when our resources are tight. The risk of not keeping up our stakeholder communications is that we leave the people most important to our organizations in the dark and lose their loyalty. Many of us could gain by working towards higher levels of accountability and getting out of the bad habit of ‘one-way’ communications in our once a year annual reports.

    Co-ops are held to high levels of accountability because their member-owners are often dependent on the success of the co-op for their livelihoods, shelter or health services. According to Terri-Lynn Proulx, a Co-op Developer with the Province of Manitoba’s Cooperative Development Services, that accountability is also enshrined in Manitoba’s Co-operatives Act. Unlike non-profits which have few legislated requirements for accountability to their stakeholders, Terri points out that the Act provides clarity and consistency in the governance of Manitoba’s co-ops.

    Co-ops in Manitoba meet their transparency and accountability commitments through diverse means but for all - it begins with clear membership agreements. Ongoing dialogue and communications are managed through dedicated member-relations staff, regular reporting, stakeholder meetings and even social media. This high level of communicative-ness might just give co-ops an edge in the marketplace too as consumers have come to expect high levels of interaction.

  3. Autonomy and independence:

    Co-ops strive to serve their member-owners and the greater society by profit-making or at least being self-sustaining. Conversely, our sector’s very definition sets us up for ‘NOT’ generating profits. There are many reasons take advantage of profitable activities to secure our financial wellbeing but we worry that it will put our public funding at jeopardy. Though driven by a community development mission, Neechi Foods Co-op [LINK http://www.neechi.ca] has turned their business success into an expansion of services. By founding as a co-op and not a charity or non-profit, Neechi Foods has been able to use their economic independence to dream big, take risks and evolve. This year they will open Neechi Commons, an ambitious new multi-million dollar development.

    Co-ops can also attract investment and issue investment shares. Upcoming changes to Manitoba Co-op Act will make this easier by introducing guidelines for the multi-stakeholder co-op which allow investors to have more involvement in co-ops. Vera Goussaert of the Manitoba Co-op Association is excited by this innovation. She feels the introduction of the multi-stakeholder model to Manitoba is likely to expand the pool of investment capital for co-ops and drive innovative partnerships between co-ops, credit unions and for-profit businesses.

    These changes to the Co-op Act will build on the success of Manitoba’s new co-op tax credit - the first of it’s kind in Canada. This tax credit enables established and successful co-ops and credit unions to help new and expanding co-ops by contributing cash to a co-op development fund in exchange for a tax credit.

    Could non-profits be more innovative if we were in control of our financial destinies? Could we reduce the time we spend on our funder reporting requirements and increase the time we have for building our organizations, if we were less reliant on public funds? Could non-profits increase the participation of our stakeholders in our success if we adopted a version of ‘profit-sharing’ that would reward their participation with increased value (not necessarily monetary) when we succeed?

  4. Commitment to co-operation of co-operatives:

    Co-ops see their fellow co-ops as allies in a larger mission. This basis of unity permits the co-ops to partner and share information effortlessly. It also makes advocacy easier and I know from experience that presenting a unified front is essential to trying to affect change.

    Our non-profit sector has lacked a unified voice and vision. Limited funding pools and constrained thinking have created an unhealthy environment of competitiveness and distrust in some areas of the sector. In comparison, Manitoba’s co-ops are working in collaboration with the Province to create a long-term strategy for their sector and initiate programs to stimulate innovation. It appears that we are falling behind.

    BC might have found a way to address this. The United Community Services Co-op is a mechanism for non-profit organizations in BC to collaborate. The UCS Co-op provides “potential for cash pools, bulk purchasing, and collaborations on research, innovation, and sector-wide initiatives.” Could a co-op of non-profits in Manitoba drive innovation in the sector? The Manitoba Federation of Non-profit Organizations (MFNPO) already serves as a nexus point, could they lead such an initiative here?

I’d like to inspire some fresh ideas and debate so please post a comment if this entry spurs a response!

    • #Co-ops
    • #finance
    • #community
  • 1 year ago
  • 1
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Co-operatives 101

By: Tara Walker

A co-operative is an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically-controlled enterprise. (cited in http://www.creditunion.mb.ca/about/index.htm)

The values of the co-op movement – dating back to the very beginning in 1752 in the US or England in 1844 depending on the source – are based on self-responsibility, democracy, equity and solidarity. These values are enshrined in the international co-op principles stated by the International Cooperative Alliance (cited in http://www.creditunion.mb.ca/about/index.htm):

  • 1st Principle: Voluntary and Open Membership
  • 2nd Principle: Democratic Member Control
  • 3rd Principle: Member Economic Participation
  • 4th Principle: Autonomy and Independence
  • 5th Principle: Education, Training and Information
  • 6th Principle: Co-operation among Co-operatives
  • 7th Principle: Concern for Community

In Manitoba, there are three main types of cooperatives:

A consumer co-op provides products or services to its members (such as a retail co-op, housing, health- care or child-care co-op).

A producer co-op processes and markets the goods or services produced by its members, and/or supplies products or services necessary to the members’ professional activities (such as independent entrepreneurs, artisans, or farmers).

A worker co-op provides employment for its members. In this type of co-op, the employees are the members and the owners of the enterprise. (source: Manitoba Co-operative Association

There are also Worker-Shareholder and Multi-stakeholder co-ops that are beginning to see more uptake here.

WHAT’S THE MANITOBA CO-OP STORY?

The co-op movement got an early start in Manitoba’s agricultural communities but has since blossomed into over 400 co-ops. The province is also home to unique sets of expertise in pursuing opportunities and in meeting the needs of groups such as Aboriginal, new Canadian and urban communities. In rural centres, community childcare and fitness centre co-ops fill gaps in the market. Our shifting values are also creating opportunities for new co-ops like a much anticipated car share Peg City Car Co-op  and organic food production co-ops like a Manitoba Organic Milk Co-op Ltd.

Credit must be given to our co-op friendly provincial government as well. Reaching back as far as 1887 with the first co-op enabling legislation to last year’s launch of a first in Canada co-op tax credit, Manitoba has been a leader in supporting the development of co-ops.

Manitoba Resources:

Manitoba Co-operative Association: Check out the 10 year Manitoba co-op strategy: Leading and making a difference in Manitoba - the co-op way

Manitoba Cooperative Development Services

National Resources: CoopZone

Canadian Co-operative Association

    • #co-ops
  • 1 year ago
  • 1
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Marrying the old and new through innovation

By: Katrina Elisse Caudle

New times brings new ways of thinking. Every minute every day something is changing. But in times of rapid change, it’s important to find the balance between the new and old, to honour what has come before while not being strangled by it. Embracing those ways of thinking is the essence of innovation.

New media has been touted as the great equalizer. Any individual or organization can have a widespread media influence through the Internet, social media tools, and computers that give access to technology to shorten the gap between professional and personal. This is no small thing. Commentary on the recent Egyptian uprising has pointed back to social media being very influential accelerating the action and transmitting information. Youtube has become such a powerhouse that music companies have accounts that can officially release new videos. Through e-mail and the Internet, a local feminist group named FemRev was able to mobilize across the country to find local team members in every province for support.

The message is no boundaries. We can do anything, talk to anyone, and accomplish so much more than we could alone. It’s startling and inspiring.

But as we embrace these tools and cut our teeth on them, it’s important to recognize that the new does not erase the old. Because many of us embrace them, it doesn’t mean that they are universally better or more effective than older forms.

After all, can 140 characters on twitter replace the feeling of holding a newspaper? Does an old event on Facebook replace the torn tickets in your wallet? The digital is inherently intangible which gives it the freedom to spread like wild fire across the country. But there are some things that even the most inspiring, most advanced technology won’t ever be able to do.

And maybe, they shouldn’t. We’re physical creatures and while the Internet and digital technology have opened worlds of possibility, we will always need to see people, talk to them instead of text, hear the smile in their voice instead of reading the emoticon. We can do powerful things, but we will always need physical connection.

Understanding and recognizing that need is what will make us wiser and more innovative as a whole. Just because we can mass produce clothing, doesn’t mean that everyone feels good about what they wear or that our quality of life has gone up. It’s how we use those technologies that make a difference on a human scale.

Our globalization of our food systems has made it so that I can have any fruit I want, literally any time of the year. But because of how we developed food systems, the majority of produce grown is thrown out before it reaches the store. Another half of that is thrown out at the store, and even more gets thrown out in the home. Food banks get left with piles of farm fresh local vegetables while families take the packaged food they recognize because the vegetables look different (they’re more natural) than what’s familiar. Plus the dirt makes them look unclean. Is this an effective use of our resources? Some say there’s a hunger problem, but I’d call it a problem in how we utilize our resources. As a culture, we are definitely not very efficient.

Once we’ve developed the technology to influence our environment, it’s important that we turn an eye to how to ensure these technologies are being used and if they’re being used for the highest good of all. This might take some of the old wisdom to balance out. What if instead of globalizing, we used modern technology to re-localize food production? In the end, technology didn’t necessarily solve our need for food - but based on what we’ve learned, maybe we’re ready to refine it again. By now, we’ve got many years of experience under our belt - why not refine the process to eliminate the waste and detrimental effects on our environment? Use engineering and modern convenience to establish roof top and indoor gardens where no green space in available. Use social media to spread the word on how important it is to localize food production. Use our brains with our brawn to use what we’ve got more intelligently, with more innovation.

But we understand that. As individuals who have seen the Internet develop, gone through information overload, and seen the dangers and flaws of becoming too plugged in - we’re developing the savvy to know when to use a pen and when to use a keyboard. We’re beginning to understand that an e-mail can be sent in a moment, but that a handwritten letter will feed us in a way the computer can’t. Because the Internet and the new can never replace the old. It can only honour what we know and help it reach new heights.

  • 1 year ago
  • 1
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Philanthropy 2.0: The emerging social conscience in the corporate sector

By: Katrina Elisse Caudle

Corporate sponsorship is nothing new. From charitable branches, to very public donations of time, money, and resources - the corporate world has always benefited from being socially conscious and involved in non-profits. You might even say it comes from a genuine desire to raise the standard of living in communities. It certainly does help the reputation when you find out your child can get involved in hockey because Tim Horton’s has a local minor Sports Program or when you find out that our beloved Jazz Festival (and its awesome free main stage) wouldn’t happen without TD Canada Trust. Sometimes when the public funding or political will isn’t there, the business sector ensures that worthy causes can continue.

Corporations also have a nasty reputation of doing what they can to monopolize industries and then reek havoc with them. Privatization of natural resources and necessary civic structures like water, sewer systems, garbage collection, and food distribution is among one of the largest issues faced by modern populations. Underground deals and shady social actions regarding restricting and profiting from the necessities of life have left a bad taste in our mouths for years.

But with large scale projects like Pepsi’s Refresh campaign, it seems that the corporate world is renewing its vigor to prove to everyone that they’ve got our best interests at heart. To top it off, they’re putting the power in our hands.

How it works is this - Pepsi wants you to submit your ideas to “refresh” your community (essentially make a positive impact). The ideas are grouped into categories, from arts to community to education. The grants range from five thousand to fifty thousand, each group having several (sometimes as many as 20) awards a cycle, with 8 cycles in a year. That’s nothing to sneeze at. That means over a million dollars donated throughout the year. Once you’re up on the website, the public votes on your idea and you can see where everyone sits. Send your members, your supporters, your family, and your friends! Anyone can register for the website and help you win a pretty penny for your community initiative!

While corporate sponsorship might seem crass, it’s amazing to think that instead of delicately crafting those letters of sponsorship andĀ pounding the pavement there’s a company that wants you to come to them for funding. Quite a switch! Maybe it isn’t so crass as that we’ve taught ourselves that the corporate world and the non-profit world are birds of a different feather, one set out for our good and one out for their own. When you work in the non-profit sector, instinctively you feel that your goals are different - you’re not there to make money, you’re there to make a difference.

Sometimes though, the best businesses are there for the same reason. What about that company that wanted to make a great cup of coffee? Or offer a great game to play? Or maybe even the perfect shoe? Even if they’re built on the concept of making money (something even non-profits can’t do without), doesn’t mean that they didn’t start out wanting to make the world a better place. And even if somewhere along the way the dollars became bigger than the dream, maybe sponsoring non-profits is how they keep that dream alive.

A community is made of many different parts, ones that sometimes don’t agree with each other in the slightest. We all have those cousins, or that aunt and uncle that just don’t get along. But it never meant you weren’t family. It’s just the way it goes. Maybe non-profits and the business sector don’t sit down to Sunday dinner together, but doesn’t mean that they always have to be at odds. Maybe bridging the gap between them through the act of sponsorship reunites our concept of a better standard of living and a more sustainable way of providing that living - both essentially to a thriving community. After all, you may have heard that they’ve got a little love baby… Social enterprise anyone?

    • #private sector
    • #philanthropy
  • 1 year ago
  • 3
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
← Newer • Older →
Page 1 of 3

About

The Manitoba Federation of Non-Profit Organizations and the Canadian Non-Profit Innovators Network invite you to consider the future of the non-profit sector and the place of social innovation in Manitoba today.

Subscribe to this blog or join us on Facebook for stories about local, regional and national non-profits embracing social innovation, feature interviews with leaders in the community on the topic of social innovation, insightful commentary and links to topical resources.

Browse Topics

Pages

  • About This Project
  • What is Social Innovation?

Portrait/Logo

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr